What Does Careless Driving Mean?
Careless Driving Is Defined Within the Highway Traffic Act As Driving a Vehicle Without Due Care and Attention or Reasonable Consideration For Other Persons Using the Highway. Highway Is Defined Broadly and Includes What Most People Define As Roads. Fines Range From $400 to $2,000 and Insurance Affects Are Likely Significant.
YM Paralegal says
carefully. responsibly. prudently. safely. cautiously.
Fighting a Careless Driving Charge Helps to Protect Your Driving Record, Demerit Points, Insurance Rates, and Driving Privileges!
The law treats the driving offence of careless driving very seriously. Generally, the offence is charged when the operator of a vehicle, typically, among other possibilities, the driver of a motor vehicle, fails to operate the vehicle to the standard expected of an "ordinary prudent driver". An even more serious charge exists for circumstances where an operator of a vehicle fails to operate the vehicle as expected for an "em>ordinary prudent driver" resulting in a death or injury.
How Is Careless Driving Legally Defined?
The offence of careless driving is a relatively vague yet broadly applicable charge. The offence of careless driving is specifically defined as per the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8 wherein it is stated:
130 (1) Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway.
(2) On conviction under subsection (1), a person is liable to a fine of not less than $400 and not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both, and in addition his or her driver’s licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than two years.
Careless Driving Causing Bodily Harm or Death
(3) Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway and who thereby causes bodily harm or death to any person.
(4) On conviction under subsection (3), a person is liable to a fine of not less than $2,000 and not more than $50,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years, or to both, and in addition his or her driver’s licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than five years.
Deemed Lack of Reasonable Consideration
(5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (3), a person is deemed to drive without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway if he or she drives in a manner that may limit his or her ability to prudently adjust to changing circumstances on the highway.
Sentencing — Aggravating Factor
(6) A court that imposes a sentence for an offence under subsection (3) shall consider as an aggravating factor evidence that bodily harm or death was caused to a person who, in the circumstances of the offence, was vulnerable to a lack of due care and attention or reasonable consideration by a driver, including by virtue of the fact that the person was a pedestrian or cyclist.
As said and shown above, what constitutes as careless driving is defined vaguely as driving "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"; and thus actual court cases often require a review of previous judicial decisions when determining, from a reasonably objective viewpoint, what is meant by "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons". As examples:
- Is changing a radio station driving "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Is two-handed eating while steering with knees driving "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Is glancing at a map while trying to navigate an unfamiliar city driving "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Is reading a report in preparation of a morning meeting while commuting to work driving "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
What Is the Legal Meaning of Due Care and Attention?
It is said that "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons" requires more than imperfect driving and instead requires driving conduct that is something than the driving conduct of a hypothetical "ordinary prudent driver". This basis for analyzing what constitutes as careless driving was established by the Court of Appeal within R. v. Beauchamp, 1952 CanLII 60 as the precedent setting case that is now relied upon within recent cases such as occurred in York (Regional Municipality) v. Lam, 2017 ONCJ 290 which stated:
 In determining the requisite standard of care and skill required of a motorist facing a charge of careless driving, I look to the often cited Ontario Court of Appeal judgment, R. v. Beauchamp, 1952 CanLII 60 (ON CA),  O.R. 422, in which the standard is not one of perfection. Instead, Justice MacKay, writing for the Court, sets out the appropriate legal test as follows:
… It is whether it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this accused, in the light of existing circumstances of which he was aware or of which a driver exercising ordinary care should have been aware, failed to use the care and attention or to give to other persons using the highway the consideration that a driver of ordinary care would have used or given in the circumstances? The use of the term “due care”, which means care owing in the circumstances, makes it quite clear that, while the legal standard of care remains the same in the sense that it is what the average careful man would have done in like circumstances, the factual standard is a constantly shifting one, depending on road, visibility, weather conditions, traffic conditions that exist or may reasonably be expected, and any other conditions that ordinary prudent drivers would take into consideration. It is a question of fact, depending on the circumstances in each case. [Emphasis added.]
Vehicle Broadly Defined
Is It True That a Person Riding a Bike Can Be Charged With Careless Driving?
Interestingly, the charge of careless driving, as per section 130 of the Highway Traffic Act as provided above, applies to the operation of a "vehicle" unlike many other sections of the Highway Traffic Act that apply to a "motor vehicle". Whereas section 1 of the Highway Traffic Act defines "vehicle" as including bicycle, and any vehicle propelled by muscular power, a person on a bicycle, among other vehicles without a motor, can be charged with careless driving. Specifically, the definitions of "bicycle" and "vehicle" per the Highway Traffic Act are stated as:
“bicycle” includes a tricycle, a unicycle and a power-assisted bicycle but does not include a motor assisted bicycle;
“vehicle” includes a motor vehicle, trailer, traction engine, farm tractor, road-building machine, bicycle and any vehicle drawn, propelled or driven by any kind of power, including muscular power, but does not include a motorized snow vehicle or a street car;
What Are the Potential Punishments Applicable to Careless Driving?
Upon conviction for careless driving, meaning general careless driving charge as prescribed within section 130(1) of the Highway Traffic Act rather than careless driving causing death or injury charge as prescribed within section 130(3) of the Highway Traffic Act, serious consequences should be expected. The consequences include a fine ranging from $400 and $2,000 plus a victim surcharge. The convicted driver also accumulates six (6) demerit points as well as being subjected to a possible two (2) year license suspension and even jail for up to six (6) months. Additionally, increased insurance rates are likely as is the likelihood of insurance coverage being available only from a high-risk insurance provider.
Page 2 - Careless Driving, Causing Death or Injury Page 3 - Careless Driving, Defence Strategy
The topic of careless driving is a very deep legal subject with many subtopics that can only be lightly touched upon within a webpage article. Legal practitioners and scholars could spend hours discussing the various twists and turns that apply to the principles and concepts mentioned here.